Large National Bank Squashes Age Discrimination Claim with Jury Verdict

A large national bank went to trial to defend itself against age discrimination claims. Prior to the trial, CDF had already reduced our client’s exposure by persuading the judge to dismiss the plaintiff's supervisor, whom was named as an individual defendant, and to dismiss the plaintiff's retaliation and race discrimination claims as well. At trial, CDF successfully prevented the plaintiff from calling an expert witness regarding human resources procedures. Our strategic approach resulted in a defense verdict for our client.

Location

Superior Court of California, County of Orange

Counsel

Dave Carothers

Related Industries

  • Financial Services

Related Case Studies

CDF Scores Decertification of Class After Strategic Removal And...

CDF Persuades California Supreme Court to Throw Out Class...

Business Fraud Claims Against Mortgage Company Rejected by Judge

Dismissal of Fraud and RICO Claims Leads to Favorable...

Gender Discrimination Case Against National Mortgage Lender Defeated in...

Employee Discharged for Misconduct Claiming Defamation Defeated At Trial

Financial Institution Reduces Threat of “Bet the Company” Litigation...

Jury Trial Delivers Defense Victory for a Major National...

Compliance Audit of Acquisition Target Reveals Critical Liability Info

Gender Discrimination Claims by Executive Defeated by Defense Verdict...

Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger LLP © 2018

Why CDFWhat We DoAttorneysCase StudiesNews & EventsOfficesAttorney AdvertisingDisclaimer