California Consumers Benefit from Out-of-State Computer Seller’s Win in §17200 Action

Successfully obtained summary judgment for an out-of-state computer seller in an action brought by an in-state consumer electronics association to enjoin sales in California.  The association brought a claim under Business & Professions Code §17200 alleging that the seller violated the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act because the seller did not have service and repair facilities in California.  The trial court granted summary judgment holding that that section of the Song-Beverly Act violated the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution.  The court of appeal, in a published opinion, affirmed without reaching the constitutional issue. This case is important because it allowed out-of-state mail order companies to offer more consumer choices and a superior service model to California consumers.  Resulted in a published opinion, California State Electronics Assn. v. Zeos International Ltd., 41Cal.App. 4th 1270, 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 127 (1996).


Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
California Courts of Appeal


Jeffrey L. Sikkema
David G. Hagopian

Related Industries

  • Technology & Telecommunications

Related Case Studies

CDF Obtains Order Denying Missclassification Claim on Behalf of...

Santa Ana Labor Commissioner Rules Completely in Favor of...

Complete Defense Verdict in Overtime Misclassification Trial

Long Beach Labor Commissioner Rules Completely in Favor of...

Defense Verdict in Overtime Action Brought by Salaried Network...

Plaintiff Dismisses Case After Being Stung with Discovery Sanctions

Age Discrimination Claim, Based on Failure to Promote, Successfully...

Complete Victory in Trial for CFO Against the SEC

Cable, Internet and Telephone Service Provider Ends Multiple Employee...

Proper Harassment Claim Investigation Terminates Manager and Avoids Litigation

Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger LLP © 2018

Why CDFWhat We DoAttorneysCase StudiesNews & EventsOfficesAttorney AdvertisingDisclaimer